(Header image source)
Please note I hope to have Part 3 of my musings about civilizational collapse and biology done in another couple of weeks. Parts 1 and 2:
Please don’t forget to support Tommy’s work.
ARE RUFF TIMES COMING?
We’ve been contemplating getting a dog. Many of our neighbors have dogs and the kids are please-please-please can we get one? I do want some kind of guard dog. Not a trained attack dog – that’s a lot for a first dog – but definitely some kind of dog that will regard our family as their pack and be defensive of it. I’m leaning towards some kind of shepherd. Currently the names that are being tossed around for consideration alternate between FENRIR / FENRIS and CEREBUS. OK, ok, those are my proposals. And since I’m the one paying for the critter, I have the deciding vote. Heh.
Health of the beast will be a concern, of course, and a good friend of mine who has a dog advocates for Dinovite, a food supplement that adds in lots of macrobiotic and trace element nutrition. Another competitive product that I’ve heard about, heavily promoted by Glenn Beck, is Ruff Greens. In it they have a catchy phrase, talking smack about the dry kibble food so many use as their default dog food, “… you’re dog’s food, is dead food” followed by a plaintive whine from a disappointed dog. Keep this phrase in mind.
In Dark Thoughts in the Small Hours I mused about several things related to the fact that we’ve known that the mRNA lasts and produces spike proteins in the body (Ryan Cole’s mentioned 60 days at a minimum; an immunologist I know says the mRNA chemistry’s been altered to enhance longevity) – not staying in the arm as promised, and certainly the spikes last far longer than promised, as well as witnessing the CDC also quietly disappearing related data about the lifespan of the spike protein itself in the body. In particular we know the Liquid Nano-Particles (LNPs) go to the ovaries (testes too, but definitely the ovaries).
The high concentration of spike protein found in testes and ovaries in the secret Pfizer data released by the Japanese agency raises questions, too. “Will we be rendering young people infertile?” Bridle asked.
Just look at the curves showing accumulation of spike proteins in the ovaries, where a girl is born with all the eggs they’ll ever have in their life (though there’s some speculation this may not be as hard-and-fast as first believed).
The spike protein is a KNOWN inflammatory agent. The spike protein is a known damaging agent in general. We know it interferes with DNA repair. So we’re weakening DNA repair in and inducing inflammation in children’s organs related to creating further children. Plus don’t forget the micro clotting that happens; when micro clots form, tissue downstream of those clots is probably damaged and can even die.
Imagine, for a moment, ovary capillaries being swarmed with LNPs. These LNPs dump their mRNA payloads into the capillary endothelial cells, which then produce spike proteins that express at the surface interacting with the blood flow, and produce micro clots (underlining added):
If they reach the brain, they can cause a stroke or confusion. If they lodge in the heart, they can cause a heart attack or promote inflammation. If they lodge in the smaller blood vessels that provide oxygen to the hands or feet, they can cause those limbs to go numb and possibly require amputation. Clots in other organs, such as the liver or the kidneys, could cause those organs to fail.
The diagnosis from the clotting depends largely on where the clots end up lodging, which explains why people who take spike protein “vaccine” shots experience such a wide array of injuries and deaths. Over one million injuries are now reported in VAERS CDC database, with estimates of hundreds of thousands of deaths so far in the USA alone.
As Dr. Charles Hoffe ominously notes in the video above, it’s almost certainly damaged the tissues downstream from the clots. So suddenly, in another wee hour depression-fest, it suddenly hit me. If an ovary gets microclotting from the vaccine LNPs accumulating there – what damage might have been done to you, your Jabbed daughters’ or your granddaughters’ ovaries?
There were also warnings about the vaccine triggering an immune response against placental proteins; a warning that has now – per this video – been observed:
This may be why women are starting to lie about their vaxx status – the possibility of decreased fertility and not wanting to disclose that to potential mates. I know that, were something to happen to my marriage – whether divorce (a word being tossed around far too often at Casa Nitzakhon right now) or my Jabbed-and-boosted wife succumbing – I would not pursue anyone but a confirmed Pureblood. Though, as an aside, there’s this little ditty of folk wisdom:
The first marriage is the triumph of love over fear.
The second marriage is the triumph of hope over experience.
The third marriage? You’re an idiot.
Having said that, I like being married.
Nor should we casually dismiss a parallel Israel study that found that sperm concentrations also decreased from prior-to-vaccination; more here. (Hey, depopulationist Globalists are not going to ignore the other half of the equation, are they?) Leading to grim humour such as:
And, as with the ovaries & female fertility claims, there is controversy about this male-oriented result with the “factcheckers” and others showing studies that there’s no problem – but what fascinates me is the rush to downplay and/or dismiss any of these potential deleterious side effects. SCIENCE says that if there are conflicting studies, put everything out there, let people weigh the studies and do replication efforts in both directions. It was the SHUT UP! argument on this, and global warming, and many other things that made me so suspicious on so many things pertaining to the Left:
AN ENGINEERING CROSSOVER
In my own line of work there is a discipline called FMEA. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis. In it there is a three-factor number, the Risk Priority Number. Based on three factors being ranked from 1 – 10, these three numbers are then multiplied together to form the RPN which then guides attention to trying to reduce these three factors for a safer / more reliable design or process.
Severity; the higher the number, the more severe the risk. Outright infertility would obviously be a 10.
Occurrence; the potential rate of failure (1 being very rare, 10 being frequent).
Detection; the potential to detect the failure happening and prevent it from having an impact.
As a practical example of this concept of risk times consequences, let’s consider two games with precisely identical odds. One, in which you lose if a six-sided die comes up on a one. The other, you play Russian Roulette with a one-bullet six-shooter. Again, precisely the same odds… given that, which would you choose to play? Uh huh, right. Me too. Why? Because though the odds are the same, the consequences are very different if your number comes up.
With billions being injected, with ~62% (per Hoffe) having microclotting, and with no known way of detection of impacted fertility of which I’m aware short of some kind of active-metabolism imaging study of the ovaries as a proxy for still fertile and capable ovum, I’d argue that the RPN is very high. And on a species-wide basis. More than one person has commented online “Once you’ve had the shot, you can’t undo it”.
So given the consequences to the human species, even if the odds appear low, why are so many people so desperate to deny even considering the risk-times-consequences number? And when you factor in a very high detection number (i.e., hard to detect there’s an issue), the RPN for infertility stands out like a shining beacon of risk.
We now have some very alarming fertility numbers being seen in multiple countries.
From this baseline article, Germany and Hungary are showing drastic fertility drops:
… almost exactly nine months after the first surge of experimental mRNA treatments intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus.
Similar 10-12 percent declines have been observed in the UK, North Dakota, and Switzerland.
More on Switzerland:
I state this without having run an analysis, but the above data look ripe for a Chi-squared analysis to see if those red lines are statistically-significant in their difference from prior years. News from Sinagpore (link in original):
Again, Singapore began mass mRNA vaccinations of women (and men) of childbearing age in June 2021; March 2022 is exactly nine months later.
In March, the increase in births abruptly reversed. Between March and June 2022 – the most recent month for which figures are available – Singapore has recorded about 1,000 fewer live births compared to 2021, a decline of 8.5 percent. The drop has been consistent each month.
Sweden (embedded quote):
For example, in the Swedish capitol of Stockholm, there has been a 14% reduction in births the first quarter of 2022 compared with 2021. And it is not only in Stockholm, the fertility has dropped all across Sweden.
“It is a drastic and remarkable reduction beyond the usual. We have never seen anything like this before, that the bottom just falls out in just one quarter” said Gunnar Andersson, professor in demographics at Stockholm University to Dagens Nyheter.
More on Sweden:
Gibralter and Israel, amongst a few others, approached 100% vaccination rates (IIRC Gibraltar hit it). I’m searching for data for these and others (tell me here). As to the first-quarter data we know, it’s already mid-August. Where are the second-quarter reports? Note the date on the link just above, as well as on the one about Germany and Hungary. If, by late October, we don’t see second-quarter results, we can infer it’s bad. Very bad. Globally bad. So bad, so widespread, no government dares let the data be seen. We’ve already seen one of the leading fertility specialists in Australia be fired for pointing out that the Jab is associated with miscarriages:
And Dr. Naomi Wolf got dumped from twitter for this tidbit:
FDA Knew 44% of Pregnant Women in Pfizer Trial Suffered Miscarriages | It is indisputable that neither Pfizer nor the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is at all concerned about adverse events related to Pfizer’s clinical trial data. After all, they sought to hide it from the general public for 75 years. While blatantly unacceptable, the fact both parties knew that 44 percent of pregnant women | The Tea Party’s Front Page. | Slowly, our freedoms are being chipped away with, “We know better…” justification as its hammer and chisel. (ussanews.com)
Let us not ignore the impact on nursing babies. From the Telegram channel @Covid19vaccinevictims:
Yaffa Shiraz, Ph.D. reveals new VAERS data on infant deaths, including injuries reported of nursing babies whose mothers had received the Pfizer injection.
Well the court ordered them to make public thousands of pages of documents each month. My hypothesis above seems to be validated by the uncovering of what is not just troubling, but absolutely terrifying data on the lack of safety in pregnancy. While Dr Naomi Wolf and the WarRoom/DailyClout Research Volunteers recently corrected a report that overcounted miscarriages in one section of the Pfizer documents, they are right to have early and often called attention to signals about this issue overall. Indeed in May 2022, they broke the story of another section of the Pfizer documents, in which the mortality rate of fetuses and babies of women vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA injection was about 80 per cent.
And a concluding critical point from the above link (italics replaced by underlining):
per the now ignored, but long standing regulatory standard, when a new medicine or device is introduced, you must first assume any adverse effects or deaths reported to be related to the intervention until proven otherwise. … We must assume the vaccines are impacting fertility unless some other provable or credible explanations for a sudden drop in month to month birth rates.
So tell me: a White Plague scenario, or Children of Men? Could the LNPs go to female fetuses still inside and sterilize them too, a la Prelude to Chaos? Because we do know that NPs in general will cross the placenta. Who wants to be the official to go onto news programs to announce that the “safe and effective” Jab they pushed and cajoled and forced upon the world… actually sterilized vast swaths of the human race including families looking to have their own little bundles of joy? Let alone the SADS “died suddenly” phenomenon and excess mortality at the back end of life? More on that here. And here. And in the below video:
While this might be a fantasy for some men absent parental responsibility, a single man can impregnate and, thus, create far more offspring given an unlimited supply of women than the reverse. By their very biology (wait, did I just use the “B” word?) women can create and nurture far fewer children. Thus, having known nano-particles have been known to target the ovaries since at least 2010, more from 2012 in a PDF presentation, reducing female fertility is the obvious way to target global human fertility – female fertility being the constraining factor. Not like anyone would do that, of course. Right? Right? From 2015, transcribed from the video embedded here:
There WILL be a need to … prevent them from giving birth.
They’ve been thinking about birth prevention being an avenue of population control for a long time:
If my speculations – amongst many with similar thoughts – are prophetic? All those parents who meant well, who did good, who protected themselves and others by Jabbing themselves and their daughters and granddaughters? Those who trusted without question, those who had no curiosity but merely obeyed should be asked:
Did the Jab turn your posterity’s OVARIES… into DEADVARIES?
MAGIC EIGHT-BALL SAYS?